Generally, when I receive stuff by e-mail it goes directly to the recycle bin. But this particular e-mail made me think. The following was forwarded to me by a friend, but the original is unknown.
?Like a lot of folks in this state, I own a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the dominion distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test through which I have no problem. What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don?t have to pass a animal-water test. Shouldn?t human being have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass human being to earn it for them? Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their BUTT, doing drugs, while I work. ? Can you imagine how a great deal of money the state would save if populate had to pass a urine test to learn a of the whole not private assistance check? Pass this along if you agree or simply delete whether or not you don?t. Hope you all pass it along, notwithstanding that. ? Something has to change in this country ? and soon!?
As interesting as this is, and although I fully agree with the position, I didn?t forward the e-mail to 15 people because it didn?t judge I would have bad luck for 17 years or that my nonexistent pet would die in three hours. But the unknown author, who with appearance of truth had to remain anonymous to save his job, does make a very convincing argument. If drug testing is indispensable to earn a paycheck, it should be necessary to receive one.
The author who could be from at all state and work for almost any employer, private or public, speaks for every law-abiding, hard-working, income-earning, taxpaying citizen. Most employers require a pre-employment physic test and many also have random testing clauses as a class of employment. Just as the e-mail established, you have to take a drug ground of admission to be able to procure a paycheck. So, why not require public aid recipients to take a drug test to receive a free check and health benefits?
The writer made it very clear he or she was not opponent to helping fellow Americans in need, but was annoyed that the individuals who be favored by the initiative and desire to work to contribute to the national economy is put to a greater scrutiny than ones who merely reap benefits. Understandably, it is a mean troubling that those receiving the world assistance can?t be forced to work, and they aren?t mandated to be medicine free.
We could even take the drug testing issue a bit further. To register to vote, you must give up a piss sample. To run for political place of employment you must secure a foregone number of signatures of registered voters who passed a drug test and you must do a send down, and do a subsequent drop before every primary. How about requiring candidates to submit a urine sample after making stupid comments during debates? If the comment by presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich that he believes in UFOs didn?t warrant a drug test, nothing should.
It?session not same anyone is suggesting welfare recipients must study a 600-page manual before infectious a drug test. The drug test is one of the easiest tests to take because no study is involved. There is no pressure to get every ?A? inasmuch as it?sitting a pass/fail grading body.
The process to earn a paycheck is similar to getting a free check. Both require completion of an close attention followed by one conference. Upon mutual agreement, more times than not, the potential wage earner must take and pass a mix with drugs test in the presence of working for his or her check and contributing to the command. Upon approval, the potential public aid recipient merely begins receiving benefits.
Drug testing in the workplace came near as a safety event. Working round dangerous equipment, flying an airplane, or performing surgery while mentally impaired could lead to personal injury or dying. Because we are of the like kind a litigious sodality, drug testing became an unruffled greater necessity in every industry. If someone fell on a business property and the business had not drug tested the custodian, there could be dire consequences. Some slick lawyer would furnish a way to show the employer?s failure to drug test the employee was the direct cause of his drunken client?s downfall resulting in a swollen big toe that turned into a life-threatening injury.
Since greatest number public aid recipients are responsible for children, shouldn?privately drug testing be necessary to ensure the safety of those children?
In a nutshell, to gain a check you have to have being unsalable article free; to get a free check you can be drug-test liberal. Something is not right with this system, and not one of the current campaigning ?agents of change? will address this issue.
Мой блог находят по следующим фразам
